Unjustifiable Greed by Thomas Acres

People have a tendency to be more inclined towards what comes easily and makes them feel comfortable. For instance, for several decades since industrialism long began to take into full swing in the mid eighteenth century, the human race (in more modern industrialized governments) has treated animals as a means to an end for profit. The industrial revolution lasting from 1750 to 1825, having nothing to do with all the harmful, sadistic, unhealthy treatments of animals intended for food, was a progression in science and engineering, more or less an innovation. Inevitably leading to industrialism in food specifically. For some the end result is nothing short of simple satisfactions, such as sheer happiness or for plenty the common struggle of adhering to the daily disdain for being famished.

This raises the questions of several pertaining to the ranges of inquiries of class-ism, trickling down to the undesirably mentioned health and well being (or how well off the lowly worker may be) of the 'proletariat' which is a Marxist term for the general worker whose common goal is to thrive off of their ability to work and nothing more.. Usually to make enough to force ends to meet and hopefully bind, nurture, and repetitiously do so thus the proletariat adheres to a tedious schedule that repeats dreadfully to obtain the yearly salary.

Transitioning, all the way to the CEO everything in between remains residuals in stoicism, tenaciously hard-work, and self-rewarding from the farmer to the factory worker to the frivolous consumers but the "chief executive officer,” the highest ranking executive in a company whose main responsibilities include developing and implementing high-level strategies, making major corporate decisions, managing the overall operations and resources of a company, and acting as the main point of communication between the board of directors and the corporate operations. The CEO will often have a position on the board, and in some cases is even the chair. In other words Since the CEO has a more glamorous position and duties to uphold during modern industrialization, the majority suffers a mundane list of objectives that are often referred to unfortunately as soul crushing areas of employment.

Not resigning to the gifting of input, (but steeply keeping it at a sum) this all adds up to multiple decades of developments, resulting countlessly in numerous historical events in the process including millions of deaths to both the general population worldwide and of celebrity types and royal families globally ALL subordinately due to traits of industrialism and fascism as contributors and their notable clash with infamous greed and ruthlessness, inwardly and all throughout the entire subjects plaster effectively creating dynasties of private wealth.

After all, industrialization has spread infectiously like a groundbreaking virus! From its home in Great Britain to the United States to North West Europe to Russia and other parts of the world it has had an ever-changing impact on the lives of thousands upon thousands, upon thousands. This doesn't conclude, rather it has been and perpetually proceeds to manipulate everlasting impacts to cultural and political opinions held strongly by those who may practice whichever particular involved and can well be considered a phenomenon all around being due to some very basic, yet mostly both crucial and complex technological advances in the human race pertaining to science, math, philosophy & history all at once. If the modern Lacanian-Marxist street philosopher (as he considers himself) Slavoj Zizek is correct, our Venn diagram boils lower and lower into the depths of his personal, intriguing question which I will present at the summit of all of this but in order to completely fulfill this rant because I would like it to resonate clearly , so seems to be the opinion of Zizek's that plainly, one of challenging thought and obsessive intellect in mind may variously find ways in his or her mind to go about this hall of endless corridors that IS the new cliché of industrialism in food known as the 'green capitalism scheme’. A clever but sheisty scheme' at best and it WORKS. It Is a theory of Zizek's that It Is being used to manipulate the easily persuaded by a sort of slightest of hand proposal making a company look greater for being cost effective and never going above and beyond or giving exactly what they've promised, in marketing towards the general feeble minded...not to be too specific now that question from early is "why be happy when you can be interesting?"